Indian 2 Movie Review

However, early reviews suggest that the movie may not live up to expectations.

The Good

• Kamal Haasan delivers a strong performance as always, showcasing his acting prowess
• The film boasts impressive visuals, lavish sets, and the use of AI and other technologies
• The second half of the movie, particularly Chitra's backstory and Aarthi's character, connects emotionally with the audience

The Bad

• The story fails to make a strong impact, with the focus on the same theme of corruption as the first film
• The film meanders aimlessly in the first half, with action scenes stitched together and lengthy political and social sermons
• The cameos by various actors, including SJ Suryah as the villain, do not add much value to the film
• The makeup and dialogues have been criticized as poor

The Ugly

• Several fans have expressed disappointment with the film, with one reviewer calling it "A Highly Outdated Flick" with "no Creativity" and "Worst dialogues"
• Another reviewer stated that the movie is "just an average to below average" and feels more like a setup for Indian 3
• Director S. Shankar has been accused of missing the mark with Indian 2, with some calling it a "Wasted Opportunity"

'Indian 2' compare to the original 'Indian'

Indian 2, the sequel to the 1996 blockbuster Indian, has received mixed reviews. While it retains some of the original's themes and elements, it fails to match the impact and quality of the first film.

The Original Indian (1996)

• Themes: The original film focused on corruption and the struggle against it, with Senapathy (Kamal Haasan) as the vigilante protagonist.
• Storytelling: The narrative was engaging, with a mix of action, drama, and social commentary.
• Music: The music, particularly the score by AR Rahman, was highly praised.
• Makeup and Prosthetics: Kamal Haasan's makeup and prosthetics were noted for their realism and effectiveness.

Indian 2 (2024)

• Themes: The sequel also deals with corruption, but it feels outdated and repetitive.
• Storytelling: The narrative is slow-paced and lacks the emotional depth of the original. The first half is particularly criticized for being unengaging.
• Music: The music by Anirudh Ravichander is not as impactful as AR Rahman's score.
• Makeup and Prosthetics: Kamal Haasan's makeup and prosthetics are still criticized for being unrealistic and annoying.
• Political Sermons: The film is heavily laden with political sermons and social commentary, which some viewers find tedious and outdated.

Comparison

• Engagement: The original film was more engaging and impactful, with a better balance of action, drama, and social commentary.
• Relevance: The themes of the original film were more relevant and timely, whereas the sequel feels outdated and repetitive.
• Quality: The original film's music, makeup, and overall quality were higher, making it a more memorable and enjoyable experience.